browser icon
You are using an insecure version of your web browser. Please update your browser!
Using an outdated browser makes your computer unsafe. For a safer, faster, more enjoyable user experience, please update your browser today or try a newer browser.

Election results

The results are in!

The middle column has the number of ballots that had this party in the top ten.

The right-hand column has this party’s highest and lowest ballot rankings.

The scores ranged from 169 to 384; the mean was 250. The scores clustered neatly.


 top ten ballotshigh, low rankings
Top tier: 169 - 180 points
Social Justice121, 23
Equitable111, 24
E111, 25
Cashonomic91, 18
Second tier: 192 - 212 points
Justice For People81, 20
Rainbow91, 22
LEAP72, 24
Classic102, 24
Prosperità Umana52, 23
Third tier: 225 - 248 points
Realitic103, 26
Free Robin61, 21
Future First51, 22
People72, 26
Public Health51, 25
Freedom Ringers41, 25
Human Issues22, 21
Fourth tier: 277 - 307 points
Say No More32, 24
People First33, 23
Independence42, 25
Chance36, 26
Equal Opportunity33, 23
Common Sense56, 25
Freedom11, 22
Bottom tier: 351 - 384 points
United Voice of the People23, 25
People Over Everything34, 26
Right22, 26

Congratulations to the four parties in the top tier!

Social Justice
Equitable
E
Cashonomic

These results are not surprising given the demographics of the voters: young, predominantly female, and lower-left quadrant of the political spectrum.

The positions of these four top-tier parties:

  • provide free/affordable higher education (3)
  • save/protect the environment (2)
  • legalize euthanasia
  • increase the food supply and improve health care
  • provide free universal health care
  • house the homeless; feed the hungry
  • welcome immigrants
  • eliminate poverty
  • ensure equal rights (including abortion rights) for women & living conditions for children that promote health and education

These positions are far to left of even the farthest-left American politicians, though the Green Party is closest.

Except for the welcome-immigrants position, these positions would be redundant in the Netherlands. Except for that position and the euthanasia position, these positions would be redundant in the other social democracies of Western Europe. They already have it or have accomplished it or are farther along than the U.S. in addressing it.

As you can see in the third column, showing the parties’ lowest and highest ranking, every party had voters who put it high on their ballots, in the single digits. Every party except one had voters who put it low on their ballots, in the 20’s.

These results have little to do with the communications abilities of the parties’ representatives, though I wonder how much effect Cashonomic’s videos had. Note that the top-tier parties and the bottom-tier parties share several positions, so the abortion and minimum wage positions must have been deal-breakers for many voters.

The results reflect only the views of this small population; the positions of the top-tier parties clearly have no chance of succeeding in the United States.

I leave it to you to ask why.